PDA

View Full Version : Ticketmaster settles U.S. suit


col_tom
02-24-2009, 08:18 AM
http://www.thestar.com/entertainment/article/592185

Ticket company still faces possible Canadian class-action suit and hearing in U.S. Congress

Feb 24, 2009 07:05 AM

SAMANTHA HENRY
The Associated Press

EAST RUTHERFORD, N.J. – Ticketmaster has agreed to change its online sales process after it directed people seeking Bruce Springsteen tickets to a subsidiary that charged up to 50 times the face value.

Ticketmaster reached a settlement with New Jersey, but the changes apply to all its sales nationwide, state Attorney General Anne Milgram said Monday.

The settlement comes as Ticketmaster Entertainment Inc. faces scrutiny for a proposed merger with the concert promotion giant Live Nation Inc. The merger will be the subject of congressional hearings Tuesday in Washington.

Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., has said he thinks the merger would violate antitrust rules by giving Ticketmaster a near-monopoly on the concert ticket market. Schumer said Monday that he welcomed the New Jersey settlement.

"While we are pleased Ticketmaster has acknowledged its mistake ... giving Ticketmaster near total control over the distribution of concert tickets here in New York and across the country is a recipe for disaster," he said.

In announcing the merger earlier this month, Ticketmaster Chairman Barry Diller sought to dispel the notion that the deal would lead to higher ticket prices. The companies say that a combined company could better withstand the recession, sell more tickets and improve service to fans.

The problems at the heart of New Jersey's settlement happened when tickets for Springsteen's May 21 and May 23 concerts at the Izod Center in East Rutherford, N.J. went on sale Feb. 2. Some ticket buyers were redirected from the main Ticketmaster site to TicketsNow, a subsidiary that allows people who have tickets to sell them at marked-up prices.

Milgram said at the time that redirecting them might have violated the state's consumer fraud act. Springsteen said on his website that he and the E Street Band were "furious" about what happened.

Ticketmaster blamed a software glitch. The company said the ``voluntary agreement" with the attorney general formalizes changes it had already implemented.

In the settlement, Ticketmaster did not admit wrongdoing but agreed to pay the state $350,000 (dollar figures U.S.), Milgram said. The company will also compensate ticket holders who complained and change how it handles secondary sales, she said.

Milgram says she plans to further investigate the resale market – largely dominated by ticket brokers who buy in bulk and resell at higher prices.

"What is critical is that consumers understand what is happening on any Internet site during a sale of tickets," Milgram said. "The (Ticketmaster) website suggested that consumers could continue their search on TicketsNow, making it seem there was no difference in the two markets when, in fact, of course there is."

Milgram said her office received about 2,200 complaints from people unable to buy Springsteen tickets for a face-value price of $65 or $95. They were instead directed to TicketsNow, where tickets retailed for $200 to $5,000 apiece.

Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal said he was studying Monday's settlement but would continue an independent investigation into Ticketmaster sales of Springsteen tickets in Connecticut.

Also, a Canadian man sued Ticketmaster earlier this month for redirecting him to TicketsNow when he went to buy tickets to a Smashing Pumpkins concert in November. The lawsuit, which is seeking class-action status, says the company is violating provincial anti-scalping laws by selling tickets above face value.

RichardRavenhawke
02-24-2009, 05:38 PM
Stealing from your own customers in any way, shape or form is wrong. They should be ashamed.

RR

col_tom
02-25-2009, 08:51 AM
http://www.c-span.org/cspanFLVPop.aspx?src=15days/e022409_ticketmaster.flv&s=1.401&e=0&live=N&popup=Y

Azoff and Rapino makes me laugh. They claim that indie promoters hold market share in key municipalities and cite several examples such as Seth Hurwitz' territories in Washington and Jerry Mickelson of Jam Prod's in Chicago, etc. and question why anyone would consider that a merger would lead to market dominance on the part of Live/Ticketmaster.

Hello? With Frontline (Azoff's management company) being a part of Ticketmaster, they would control the lions share of dominant acts. How will Hurwitz fill the venues he has if he can't obtain the acts?

Further, Azoff claims this merger is all about the artists, the fans, and the good of the industry. He goes on to cry over the lack of new talent and the industry's inability to develop any. Well if timelines serve correct, I believe that Azoff bought up all the small management firms to gain a stranglehold on the top acts in the country. He has ZERO interest in new, emerging acts. Just look at his roster. They're all iconic legacy acts such as AC/DC, Springsteen, The Eagles, etc. If the merger goes through, they will be locked in with other legacy acts such as Madonna and U2.

Take a look at the concert landscape and all that seems to be filling venues are the legacy acts. See a pattern emerging here? This merger CANNOT go through because the entire industry will get FUCKED if it does.

With regards to Tickets Now, Azoff is asked whether the net amount is more profitable off the secondary sight than it would be from the primary site of Ticketmaster. He obfuscates by stating that the assumption of higher profitability is a misnomer as the cost of running the secondary site is quite substantial. GUFFAW!! As a webmaster and multi-media proprietor, I find that statement very funny.

RichardRavenhawke
02-27-2009, 10:16 AM
It makes me think of the word "Politics".
You know... when you break it down it is funnier than fiction.

'Poli' is the latin word for many (look it up)

and

'tics' are blood sucking creatures

Poli + tics = ?

You figure it out :rotflmao: